What Services Are Getting Privatized By UCP in Alberta

What Services Are Getting Privatized By UCP in Alberta
Public sector workers rallied for a second straight day of protest in Calgary (Dave Gilson/CBC)

The UCP Government in Alberta has embarked on several privatization initiatives across various sectors, creating more chaos. From dissolving Alberta health services to privatizing services to save money, this move will create more chaos in Alberta and hurt many Albertans regardless of their income level.

The private companies will reduce services to maximize profits, potentially affecting the quality and accessibility of essential services.

What Services Are Getting Privatized in Alberta?


Healthcare – Surgical Services

Alberta Health Services getting dissolve - more disaster on the way
Ose Irete/CBC – image credit)

The UCP government has expanded the role of private clinics in providing surgical procedures. This initiative aims to reduce wait times by outsourcing more surgeries to private providers. However, critics argue that this could lead to a two-tiered healthcare system where those who can afford private services receive faster care, leaving behind those reliant on the public system.

This division could exacerbate inequalities and undermine the universal healthcare principle. Additionally, there are concerns about the continuity of care and the overall integration of health services when multiple private entities are involved.


Diagnostic Imaging

Efforts are underway to increase private sector involvement in diagnostic imaging services, such as MRIs and CT scans. While this could potentially shorten patient wait times, there are concerns that it may also result in higher out-of-pocket costs and reduced access for individuals without private insurance, further straining the public healthcare system. The shift towards privatization in diagnostic imaging could lead to a scenario where those with financial means receive quicker diagnoses and treatment while others face prolonged waits and potential health risks.


Home Care and Long-Term Care

Privatizing home care services and long-term care facilities aims to improve service efficiency. However, the experience in other regions suggests that privatization can lead to reduced care quality, understaffing, and higher costs for patients and their families.

Vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and disabled, might suffer the most from these changes. Profit-driven private companies may also prioritize cost-cutting measures over patient well-being, leading to inadequate care standards and negative health outcomes.


Laboratory Services

The government has considered privatizing laboratory services, which would transfer management of lab testing and diagnostic services from Alberta Health Services (AHS) to private companies. This move is intended to cut costs and improve efficiency, but it may lead to reduced oversight, lower service standards, and inequities in access to essential diagnostic services. The potential for fragmentation in lab services could result in inconsistent testing quality and delayed results, impacting patient care and public health monitoring.


Education- Charter Schools and Private Schools

The UCP supports expanding charter schools and increasing funding for private schools. While this policy shift may provide more educational choices for parents, it risks diverting funds from the public education system.

This could result in underfunded public schools, larger class sizes, and diminished educational quality for students who cannot afford private education. The emphasis on charter and private schools might also lead to a lack of accountability and transparency, as these institutions may not be held to the same standards as public schools.


Infrastructure -Public-Private Partnerships (P3s)

Public-private partnerships have become a cornerstone of the UCP’s infrastructure strategy. These partnerships involve private sector participation in building and maintaining roads, schools, and healthcare facilities. While P3s are intended to leverage private sector efficiency, they often lead to higher long-term costs and reduced public control over essential services.

The profit motives of private partners can conflict with public interests, leading to compromises in service quality and accessibility. The complexity of managing P3s and ensuring fair contract terms can also pose significant challenges for the government.


Liquor Distribution

The UCP has taken steps towards privatizing aspects of liquor distribution, moving away from the previously publicly managed system. This change aims to increase market efficiency and consumer choice but has also prompted concerns about regulatory oversight and public safety. Privatization may lead to higher prices and reduced access in rural areas. The potential for increased alcohol consumption and related social issues, such as impaired driving and health problems, also raises public health concerns.


Service Alberta

Discussions are ongoing about outsourcing certain functions of Service Alberta, which handles various public services, including registry services. Privatizing these functions is expected to improve service delivery. Still, it may also lead to increased fees and reduced service accessibility for the public, particularly for those in remote or underserved areas. The loss of public sector jobs and the impact on employees’ livelihoods are additional concerns associated with this move.



The government has promoted greater private sector involvement in the management and operation of utilities, including electricity and natural gas distribution. While this effort seeks to enhance efficiency and innovation, it has raised questions about price stability and service reliability for consumers. Privatization in this sector could result in higher utility costs and decreased accountability to the public. There is also the risk that profit-driven entities may not prioritize investments in infrastructure maintenance and upgrades, potentially leading to service disruptions and long-term reliability issues.


The privatization initiatives undertaken by the UCP government in Alberta cover a wide range of services, from healthcare and education to infrastructure and utilities. While proponents argue that privatization can lead to cost savings and improved efficiency, critics warn of potential negative impacts on service quality, accessibility, and equity.

These changes might create chaos and hurt the public by increasing costs, reducing access to essential services, and exacerbating inequalities. The risk of fragmented services, reduced oversight, and the prioritization of profit over public well-being are significant concerns that need careful consideration.

As these changes unfold, their true effects on Alberta’s public services and residents will become clearer, but the risks and concerns highlighted by critics warrant careful consideration and monitoring.